ACEEE Energy Efficiency Rankings for Major Economies

U.S. Places 13th Out of 16, Behind Australia, India, and South Korea; Germany Wins “World Cup” of Energy Efficiency: 2nd International Scorecard Evaluates 16 Leading World Economies on 31 Categories.

Germany ranks first in a new energy efficiency ranking of the world’s major economies. It leads the way impressively. Italy follows closely in second place. The European Union as a whole comes in third. China takes the fourth spot, while France rounds out the top five. This ranking comes from the 2014 International Energy Efficiency Scorecard published by the nonprofit American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE). Interestingly, four nations have entered the rankings this year. These nations are India, Mexico, South Korea, and Spain. They mark a significant shift in this competitive landscape.

Now in its second edition, the ACEEE report (available online at http://aceee.org/portal/national-policy/international-scorecard) finds that, while some countries are still significantly outperforming others, there are substantial opportunities for improved energy efficiency in all economies analyzed. This includes the U.S., which ranked 13th out of 16 nations. The U.S. comes behind countries such as China, Canada, and India. In addition, the new carbon pollution standards for existing power plants proposed this June by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be a major stride in the direction of greater energy efficiency in the U.S. Furthermore, there are dozens of other international best practices that the U.S. could implement to improve its score.

Flags of Germany, Italy, and the European Union with wind turbines and trees in the background, symbolizing renewable energy and environmental sustainability.
Flags of countries participating in the ACEEE Energy Efficiency Scorecard, highlighting Germany’s top ranking and emphasis on renewable energy.

The rankings are modeled on ACEEE’s time-tested approach to energy efficiency ranking of U.S. states. They include 16 of the world’s largest economies: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, South Korea, Spain, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union. Notably, these 16 economies represent over 81 percent of global gross domestic product. They also represent 71 percent of global energy consumption.

Nation Rankings

On a scale of 100 possible points in 31 categories, the nations were ranked by ACEEE as follows: (1) Germany; (2) Italy; (3) the European Union; (tied for 4) China; (tied for 4) France; (tied for 6) Japan; (tied for 6) United Kingdom; (8) Spain; (9) Canada; (10) Australia; (11) India; (12) South Korea; (13) United States; (14) Russia; (15) Brazil; and (16) Mexico.

ACEEE divided the 31 metrics across four groupings: those that track cross-cutting aspects of energy use at the national level, as well as the three sectors primarily responsible for energy consumption in an economically developed country — buildings, industry, and transportation. For each grouping, the top-scoring countries are: E.U., France, and Italy (three-way tie for national efforts); China (buildings); Germany (industry); and Italy (transportation).

ACEEE

ACEEE Executive Director Steven Nadel said: “Germany is a prime example of a nation that has made energy efficiency a top priority. The United States, long considered an innovative and competitive world leader, has progressed slowly and has made limited progress since our last report, even as Germany, Italy, China, and other nations surge ahead.”

Dr. Philipp Ackermann, Minister and Deputy Chief of Mission, ChargΓ© d’Affaires, Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany said: “We are very pleased that Germany ranks first in ACEEE’s analysis of energy efficiency efforts among the world’s 16 largest economies. We see this as a validation that Germany’s measures are bearing fruit in its ongoing efforts to transition towards a low-carbon and energy-efficient economy. At the same time, we will continue to strive for further improvements. Energy efficiency is the second pillar of Germany’s transformation of its energy system alongside the expansion of renewable energies. Every kilowatt hour of electricity that is not consumed saves on fossil fuels and the construction of power plants and grids.”

USA

U.S. Congressman Peter Welch (Vermont) said: “There’s really no excuse for the U.S. lagging behind other nations on energy efficiency. States like Vermont have demonstrated that energy efficiency saves money, reduces environmental impact, and creates jobs. And, in an environment of gridlock, there is bipartisan common ground on this issue in Congress. I hope the 2014 International Scorecard is a wakeup call that it’s time for America to step-up and lead on energy efficiency.”

USA energy inefficiency

The ACEEE report points out that while the U.S. has made some progress towards greater energy efficiency in recent years, the overall story is disappointing. “The inefficiency in the U.S. economy means a tremendous waste of energy resources and money. Across most metrics analyzed in this International Scorecard, in the past decade the United States has made limited progress toward greater efficiency at the national level. The overall U.S. score of 42 is less than half of the possible points and is 23 points away from the top spot. Further, the United States falls behind Canada, Australia, India, and South Korea. These scores suggest that this list of countries may have an economic advantage over the United States because using less energy to produce and transport the same economic output costs them less. Their efforts to improve efficiency likely make their economies more nimble and resilient.”

ACEEE Report

The ACEEE report poses a critical question: How can the United States compete in a global economy? It must stop wasting money and energy. Other industrialized nations efficiently save resources. They can reinvest those savings. The ACEEE analysis outlines several key recommendations for the United States. First, it suggests passing a national energy savings target. This move would set a clear goal.

Next, it emphasizes the need to strengthen national model building energy codes. Doing so will establish better standards across the country. Additionally, supporting education and training in industrial sectors is crucial. This investment will equip the workforce with necessary skills. Finally, the report highlights the importance of prioritizing energy efficiency in transportation spending. This focus can lead to significant improvements and savings.

Energy Savings Saves

Rachel Young, ACEEE Research Analyst and lead author of the report said: “Countries that use energy more efficiently use fewer resources to achieve the same goals, thus reducing costs, preserving valuable natural resources, and gaining a competitive edge over other countries. In the United States, we need to do more on energy efficiency to remain competitive in an increasingly tough global marketplace.”

International Energy Efficiency Scorecard

In addition to expanding the list of global economies in the ranking, the 2012 International Energy Efficiency Scorecard underwent several changes. The team added new metrics and improved existing ones. They enhanced data sources and increased input from country experts. New metrics now include water efficiency policy, agricultural efficiency, building retrofit policies, heavy-duty fuel efficiency standards, and private sector investment in energy efficiency.

The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) – Washington, D.C. (July, 17, 2014)
IMG_5880.JPG

The ACEEE ranking system evaluates a country’s energy efficiency using two main criteria: “policy metrics” and “performance metrics”. First, “policy metrics” assess important guidelines. They consider national energy savings targets. Additionally, fuel economy standards for vehicles play a crucial role. Furthermore, energy efficiency standards for appliances are also examined. On the other hand, “performance metrics” focus on actual energy usage. These metrics provide clear and measurable outcomes. For instance, they look at average miles per gallon of on-road passenger vehicles. They also measure energy consumption per square foot of residential building space. Overall, this dual approach offers a comprehensive view of energy efficiency.

Search

Discover more from Electric Cars, Renewable Energy, Sustainability

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading