The Alliance for Automobile Manufacturers recently submitted a letter to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Said letter was part of its effort to lobby against light-duty vehicle standards.smfh!!
Don’t you love when each automaker tout their green credentials. Best is when their corporate efforts at sustainability (like Toyota’s Winter Olympics ad). In their love on duality, their trade group is quietly taking a very different approach. Their Alliance’s letter relies on shoddy and discredited studies. Trust that they always conflict with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change and air pollution.
The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) analyst Dave Cooke has a new blog post on the Alliance’s tactics below.
Dave Cooke, senior vehicles analyst
Taking a page straight out of the Disinformation Playbook
If you’re familiar with the Disinformation Playbook, then what’s in the Alliance’s paid-for report will sound familiar:
•“The Fake”—The papers cited to support weakening environmental protections. They are often paid for by industry and/or published in journals. Always with weak peer-review standards and disclosure policies. As well, the Alliance report cites studies by Tony Cox which were directly funded by the American Petroleum Institute. These cast doubt on the proven health impacts of soot. Furthermore, the journals in which the articles published are known homes for questionable industry-funded research. Usual suspect alert is Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.
•“The Diversion”—Rather than summarizing the most recent body of research on climate impacts They would be done by anyone genuinely interested in ensuring policy based on the best science. The report cherry-picks studies to weaken the case for acting on climate and reducing emissions from vehicles, either by selecting outliers or misconstruing the findings of the research.
For example, the Alliance selected “key points” from a paper on drought variation. Then they diminish the role of climate change on drought and flood. You know by ignoring the paper’s other findings. The script related to increasing temperatures. It’s a “substantial intensification of the global hydrologic cycle [that] is likely in a warming world.” More recent studies citing this work build upon these ignored findings. So they were “based on the most current data” and find evidence for the increasing role of this temperature trend. You know folks by including work by the authors of the cited study.
History repeating itself
• 1950s: Automakers denied that smog was a problem and colluded to delay deployment of pollution controls. In other words, to forestall regulation. They also ran the same play on seatbelts. They did this by claiming that “nobody knows” if they save lives. All despite a decade of definitive research.
• 1980s: Automakers claimed that there would be no health benefits for stronger pollution standards. Car companies fought under the Clean Air Act. This delay led to state action and amendments to the Act in 1990. That’s because of the nationwide problem with smog. Smog was so bad back then. So bad! So bad that finally even Congress couldn’t ignore.
Claiming that “climate models were too uncertain to act upon.” Chrysler CEO Robert Eaton even penned a Washington Post op-ed. They’d be opposing ratification of the Kyoto Protocol. Again claiming action on climate was “unwise and unnecessary.”
In the UCS report, they called for the industry to make a U-turn on its behavior. Although and hence to therefore, we have sad facts. So the sad fact of the matter is that the auto industry doesn’t want to change. This most recent submission to the government shows us. It just shows. They are still mired in their questionable tactics of old.
It’s time for automakers to lead
Let’s give a history lesson. Just before the Great Recession, the Detroit Three had fallen on hard times. Irony here was it came from neglecting to invest in the efficiency of their passenger car fleet. When gas prices rose, the companies’ sales and profits dropped like a rock. Ford took out so many, requiring massive loans they mortgaged everything. In this context, the industry seemed to finally recognize needing industry-wide efficiency standards. I mean they weren’t increased in decades.
Now, not only are automakers trying to weaken the standards. You see, they are calling into question the need for regulations at all. NHTSA would do well to ignore this rubbish. Please NHTSA,make sure its decisions are best on the best available science. However automakers like Ford and Toyota truly think that climate change needs addressed, common and do something. Bottom line, it’s incumbent upon them to keep their trade association from putting out this kind of anti-science drivel.
Automakers need to stand up for science and call out this nonsense, or they stand complicit on the side of rhetoric and lies in weakening our environmental protections just to pad their profits.
This site is protected by wp-copyrightpro.com